I was videotaping an event that could not easily be re-scheduled. I had to remain on the job for the rest of the day. So. I did not spend the day in front of a TV screen. Maybe I missed something.
After work. I viewed perhaps two hours of replays on the now unforgettable date of 9-11. Not once did I hear any commentator ask the obvious question: What was the motive? They chattered on for hours. but never once did I hear anyone raise the question of motive.
The amount of actual news regarding
How these terrorist acts had been accomplished took about five minutes to convey. This lack of information never changed throughout the day. The nation sat. transfixed in front of TV screens. watching those buildings come down. over and over. CNN had the images of these buildings in some sort of loop. or whatever technicians call sequential digital replays. The invisible talking heads talked over the images.
By evening. we knew no more than we job function email list knew after the first hour: four planes had been hijacked. three had hit the terrorists’ targets. and one had crashed in a vertical trajectory in western Pennsylvania.
Everyone interviewed on-camera
Officially agreed: we don’t know for sure who did this. Everyone seemed to agree unofficially: a private terrorist group. probably masterminded my Osama bin Laden. is the most likely candidate. I’m ready to go along with this. But no one raised the question: What was his motive? They identified him as the number-one suspect. but somehow he had no motive worth discussing on-screen.
I heard this assessment repeatedly: “This is the warfare of the 21st century.” I can hardly disagree. It worked so well in the 20th century. as how to find chase routing numbers far as murderous terrorists of civilians were concerned. that it is unlikely to be abandoned soon. There is nothing new here. We can easily substitute the words “King David Hotel” for “Twin Towers.” but nobody mentioned this.
I heard the word “cowards” used repeatedly
I don’t remember that anyone ever used this word regarding the kamikazes of World War II. A warrior who gives his life for his cause during wartime. knowing that he will surely die. is not generally dismissed as a coward. even by his hong kong data victims. What the 9-11 critics were saying was that the terrorists did this to civilians. I agree with this assessment. The terrorists were indeed cowards by Western standards. although they overcame their fear of death. It’s one thing to die deliberately for your cause as a warrior; it’s another deliberately to take specific civilians with you.