SMS the marketing channel that emits les

Are you looking for pollution-free interaction? It’s not just the content of a message that shows your commitment to the environment: the choice of channel can also make a difference! SMS Find out why it is the eco-friendly means of communication par excellence and how it behaves compared to emails, social networks and paper flyers.

 

Marketing Footprint: A Challenge for Everyone

The question of our impact on the planet is becoming increasingly important. And while it is easy to imagine the pollution caused by our travels or our waste, it is not so easy to quantify the CO2 emissions emitted by our digital habits. Yet  digital technology was responsible for 3.6% of global CO2 emissions  in 2023 and could reach 6.7% in 2040, according to ADEME. (1) and Arcep (2) . By way of comparison, this represents double the air traffic generated by aviation. In light of these figures, every one of our actions can be questioned and the energy consumption of digital marketing is no exception.

So when it comes to planning a marketing campaign questions arise: “Does sms promotional campaign my campaign pollute?

SMS”What are the energy costs of the emails and WhatsApp messages I send?

sms promotional campaign

“What media should we use to reduce our carbon footprint?

SMS Many people have look at these questions and the answers are unanimous: of all the existing means of communication, it is the one that produces the least CO2 !

 

Why do digital exchanges emit CO2?

Digital pollution comes mainly from the use of the Internet data flow. Exchanges of information stor on servers in data centers, which are then sms & black friday: tips and examples to increase sales consult by smartphones, PCs or tablets. At each stage of this process, energy is consum CO2 is emitt and the balance is worsen.

SMSCon , there are fewer intermiaries and less data . It uses the frequencies and network of traditional telephony, so the path is more direct between the sender and the recipient. The usage is therefore ruc almost to the energy ne to power the devices. Another environmental advantage is that the short message is receiv on a mobile phone rather than a computer, which has an impact on the resources ne to power the device and the energy cost of the operation.

 

SMS, email, instant messaging, calls, video conferences, flyers… a comparison of CO2 emissions by media

Most of these calculations on the carbon footprint of mobile notifications are due to Mike Berners-Lee, a researcher at Lancaster University and india data author of the book “How bad are bananas? The carbon footprint of everything” (he is also the brother of one of the inventors of the Web, Tim Berners-Lee).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top